Home Articles & Guides A signature is not a carton count: build better evidence for delivery disputes

A signature is not a carton count: build better evidence for delivery disputes

19 Oct 2026 · 6 min read

Delivery confirmation is useful, but it may leave shortages and damage unexplained. Connect dispatch counts, handovers and exceptions while the details are still available.

A signature is not a carton count: build better evidence for delivery disputes

A customer reports two missing cartons. The carrier produces a signature. The warehouse says it sent everything. All three statements can be honestly made, because the records answer different questions. Someone accepted a delivery, but nobody can yet show where the carton count changed.

Useful delivery evidence links the physical shipment to the order at each handover. It does not need to turn every small delivery into a photographic investigation. It needs to be proportionate to the goods, the route and the recurring problems the business actually encounters.

Start with what left the warehouse

Record the order lines packed, the number of packages and any pallet identifiers. Distinguish a line quantity from a package count: 120 items may be inside ten cartons on one pallet. A driver signing for one pallet has not necessarily counted the ten cartons.

Labels should make the relationship understandable. A carton reference tied to the dispatch record is more useful than an unlabelled brown box in a photograph. Where packages are numbered within a shipment, keep that numbering consistent with the manifest.

Take photographs when they provide evidence of something important, such as the completed pallet, visible carton count or load condition. A tightly wrapped pallet can conceal its contents, so a photograph alone may not establish what is inside. Packing checks and the image should support each other.

Capture the handover at the level being accepted

Agree whether the carrier collects cartons, sealed pallets or another handling unit. The collection record should state that unit clearly. If the carrier does not check internal contents, do not later describe its collection signature as proof that every product was present.

The same principle applies at the destination. A recipient may be able to count outer packages immediately but need time to unpack and check the order. Record what was checked and what remained unchecked, using the carrier's available process and the parties' agreed terms.

Drivers and receiving staff should know how to record a visible exception. A dented carton, broken wrap or count discrepancy needs a specific note connected to the shipment, rather than a generic comment that cannot be matched to a package.

Preserve the evidence before replacing the goods

When a complaint arrives, collect the shipment reference, affected items, carton identifiers, delivery time and photographs of the packaging and goods where relevant. Ask whether the packaging has been retained. Internal teams should also preserve the packing and collection records.

Check whether the order was split before treating the missing quantity as a loss. A second consignment, backordered line or separate supplier delivery can explain an apparent shortage. Customer service needs access to the actual dispatch history, not just the original order total.

Give the case one owner who can coordinate the carrier, warehouse and customer. Replacing urgently needed stock may be commercially sensible, but record it separately from the investigation. Sending replacements does not by itself establish where the original problem occurred.

Use the pattern to improve the process

If shortages cluster around mixed pallets, review how carton counts are checked and communicated. If damage appears on a particular product, inspect its packaging and loading position. If deliveries repeatedly lack usable records, examine the service being purchased and the collection workflow.

Check the relevant carrier claim procedure and contractual deadlines for each service rather than assuming a universal time limit. Staff should know when an issue must be escalated, even if the full investigation is still underway.

Good evidence reduces the number of disputes that depend on memory. The aim is a connected account of the order from packing through acceptance, showing the limits of each check as clearly as its result. That makes genuine problems easier to resolve and recurring failures easier to locate.